Sometimes when you try to solve one problem, you create another. That’s what happened in the 1950s and 1960s with the massive introduction of the Norway maple (Acer platanoides) in Eastern North America. At that time, North America’s most popular street tree, the American elm (Ulmus americana), was being decimated by Dutch elm disease and people were looking for a substitute. The Norway maple, although largely untested, quickly became the street tree of choice. It was planted by the hundreds of thousands across North America and remains, in most areas, the tree most commonly sold in garden centers.
It’s not an unattractive tree: relatively fast-growing, with dense, dark green foliage (or purple or variegated foliage in the case of some of its many cultivars) and a thick trunk. Also, it’s very tolerant of street conditions: air pollution, compacted soil, road salt, etc. It certainly looked like a good choice… at first. Over time, it showed more flaws: its dense root system uplifts and destroys sidewalks, it kills lawns and it suffers severe breakage during storms, causing untold millions of dollars of damage. Also, it turns out, for reasons unknown, to be relatively short-lived in North America: only about 50 to 60 years compared to up to 250 years in Europe. But who thinks that far ahead when planting a tree?
But the main problem turns out to be its invasive nature.
Who knew? In Central and Eastern Europe, where it is native, Norway maple is not an invasive species. It simply melds into the local forest, one tree among many. In Eastern North America, though, its seeds fall everywhere and germinate under a wide variety of conditions. And, unlike most other invasive introduced species, which tend mostly to stick to disturbed habitats, Norway maple quickly moves into and starts to dominate local forests, outcompeting native trees and especially its North American counterpart, the sugar maple (A. saccharum).
The sugar maple is the dominant tree in much of eastern North America’s climax hardwood forest, from Lake Superior to Pennsylvania (even further south in mountainous regions) and from the Eastern seaboard to the Prairies. It is well known as the source of maple sugar… and of the brilliant fall coloration that attracts so many tourists to the area in October.
War of the Species
Norway maples produce huge seed crops, much greater than sugar maples, and their seeds, carried by the wind, tend move into maple forests where they grow readily. Their seeds are capable of germinating in deep shade, even more so than those of the sugar maple, although it too is highly shade tolerant. Norway maple seedlings grow quickly and densely and generally shade out any sugar maple seedlings that do sprout. They are more heat-tolerant that young sugar maples and thus better able to survive a climate influenced by global warming. As they grow, Norway maples create greater shade and drier soil conditions than native woodland species can tolerate, creating woodlands barren of undergrowth… other than more Norway maple seedlings! It is feared that, if the spread of Norway maples into the wild continues to be tolerated, they will create a dense monoculture, eliminating entire North American ecosystems.
You can see the signs already. In many neighborhoods, Norway maples sprout abundantly from hedges, along property lines, and pop up in shade borders. When the care in local parks is neglected, they move in and take over any areas that are not regularly clipped by lawn movers. And where city and suburb meet native woodland, the Norway maple is usually already established, slowly working on becoming the dominant tree.
In natural forests in Montreal’s Mount Royal Park, for example, Norway maple seedlings were found to outnumber sugar maple seedlings 4 to 1 in 2003 and it was estimated the species would dominate the park’s forest “within a generation”.
Some authorities have “seen the light” and banned Norway maples. It is illegal to plant them in Massachusetts and New Hampshire, for example, and many municipalities have similar laws. One major chain store, Meijer Garden Centers, has voluntarily removed the plant from its stores. Unfortunately, I know of no other nurseries that have followed suit and Norway maples remain widely available in most regions where they continue to be planted on a large scale.
It would be nice if more governments banned the tree… but they seem to be turning away from ecological issues these days. And I must admit I’m amazed and puzzled that garden centers continue to produce and promote Norway maples in areas where it could easily escape into native forests. The whole problem would be reduced considerably if shoppers were simply offered other trees instead. Most probably wouldn’t even notice the difference! I don’t think home owners set off to a nursery looking for a Norway maple; they’re looking for a “shade tree”, period, and would happily choose among whatever species are offered. No government ban would be needed if garden centers showed more concern about the environment!
Help from the Strangest Place
Oddly, a plant disease may become a major player in the fight against the invasive Norway maple.
Tar spot disease (Rhytisma acerinum), a disease specific to Norway maples and certain other maples (but not the sugar maple*), has been in North America since at least the year 2000 and has spread throughout most of eastern part of the continent, especially over the last 5 years. It causes disfiguring dark black spots on Norway maple leaves, making the entire tree unattractive from midsummer until fall. No effective treatment for this disease is known other than removing the affected tree. Municipalities have been spouting nonsense about raking up and destroying leaves to reduce the effect of tar spot, but there is not one iota of proof that striving to pick up and destroy every single diseased leaf in the fall (it takes only one to cause the following year’s outbreak!) does anything other than annoy gardeners. For more information, see Yes, You Can Compost Diseased Leaves.
*There are other tar spot diseases that target the sugar maple, but they are not very common and tend to appear only sporadically and on a much more limited basis.
The more gardeners see this striking disease, which has turned entire city streets into something like a scene from a horror movie, the more likely they are to think twice about buying a Norway maple. Unfortunately, new leaves appear healthy, so during the prime season for selling trees, spring, even seriously contaminated trees show no symptoms. Still, as tar spot disease gets more and more press and the information circulates that the only real solution is avoid planting Norway maples, this can’t but help reduce Norway maple sales.
So, spread the word. Tell friends and neighbors not to plant Norway maples and, if you have that kind of influence, try to get your local government to ban planting them. Also, express your disapproval to the manager each time you see them in a local garden center. These measures may be little and late, but at least they’re a step in the right direction.
How to Distinguish Between Sugar Maples
and Norway Maples
If you want to eliminate Norway maples from a park or private lot in an area where the sugar maple is native, you have to know how to distinguish between the two species. And indeed, they are very similar in appearance. However, here are some tips on how to tell them apart..
- Snap a petiole (leaf stem) in half. If the sap is clear, it’s a sugar maple; if the sap is milky, it’s a Norway maple.
- Both have leaves with 5 pointed lobes, but if you look closely the very tip of the leaves, that of the sugar maple is rounded while that of the Norway maple is finely pointed. You have to look very closely!
- Both are easy to distinguish in the autumn! The sugar maple turns orange or red relatively early (in October); the Norway maple remains green for a long time and its leaves turn yellow before falling.
- In winter, study the buds. They are brown and pointed on sugar maples, purple green or purple, shiny and somewhat rounded on Norway maples.
- On older trees, sugar maple bark is exfoliates while that of the Norway maple is finely grooved.
Finally, the samaras (winged seeds) of the two do not look alike at all. Those of the sugar maple are globular and with narrower wings placed almost at right angles to the seed, while those of Norway maple are flattened and its wings are wide and almost in a straight line.
This article escaped me. I only found it because I was trying to find more information about the Schwedler maple. Norway maple was never overly popular here, but the Schwedler maple was planted as street trees in a few neighborhoods of the Santa Clara Valley in the late 1950s. Even though it was not common relative to other street trees, there were quite a few streets flanked with them dispersed about the Santa Clara Valley, only because so much development happened at that time. That particular cultivar was not invasive here. I wanted to find seedlings of it when I was a kid, but never did. (I am told that the seedlings are also bronze, but because I never found a seedling, I do not know.) A few Drumond maples were planted on the edge of Highway 101 in Southern San Jose, and they are now surrounded and mostly overwhelmed by what appears to be vigorous green (unvariegated) suckers. However, these could be seedlings. Because the Schwedler maples are not grafted, I suspect that the Drumond maples are not grafted either, but instead grown from cuttings. If so, the green growth around them must be seedlings or sports. Regardless, if these cultivars disperse seed, they do not get established easily here. Even the bigleaf maple that is native to the Santa Cruz Mountains above does not do well in the chaparral climate of the Santa Clara Valley below.
However, someone planted a pair of (non-cultivar) Norway maples at one of the cabins at work. I have no idea where they came from, and can only guess that they were brought from somewhere else by the family that formerly owned the cabin. While cutting down an invasive black acacia nearby, I found 5(!) seedlings of these Norway maples. That concerned me. I pulled them up and canned them, although I would not plant them in this regions if they have potential to be invasive. In fact, if the established Norway maples ever give me any trouble, I will have no problem cutting them down. The redwood forests of the Santa Cruz Mountains are very different from the chaparral climate of the Santa Clara Valley. Anyway, I really did not know what to do with these five canned Norway maples, and even considered bringing them to the Los Angeles region to see how well they would do there. (The only maples I know of in Beverly Hills are Japanese maples, which I am none too keen on.) Well, a few weeks ago, I happened to encounter one of the Schwedler maples that I knew when I was a kid, and got a few twigs from it. I plugged a few as cuttings, and grafted a few onto the five Norway maples! I SO hope they take, and I SO hope that if they take, and we plant them here, that they never get to be invasive. Otherwise, they can not stay. A neighbor planted a ‘Crimson King’ maple, which is unusually happy here. I hope my Schwedler maples are as happy. They were marginal in the Santa Clara Valley, and I suspect that they would be even less happy in Beverly Hills, in Los Angeles County.
Hi Larry, I noticed many grammatical errors (FYI). Center (sic), color (sic), neighbor (sic)…
Yes, I write from Canada, but 87% of the readers of this blog are American, so I try to write using American spellings. Same things happen when I write books: all so far have been published in the US.
Do you know of a way to mitigate the chemical changes in soil beneath the spread of these trees that will allow life of plants? Nothing will grow underneath them. There is no point in introducing plants – even native wild plants, as the chemicals from the leaves destroy everything. Amending the soil somehow?
It’s not the chemicals. Theoretically at least, Norway maples aren’t allelopathic (they don’t poison their rivals). What they do is stifle them with thick dead leaves and dry out the soil with dense, shallow roots. And how could you amend soil you can’t even scratch because of the roots? Here’s a text covering root competition that might help you. https://laidbackgardener.blog/2018/03/21/a-laidback-gardeners-guide-to-gardening-in-dry-shade/
Just about any tree can be beautiful under the right conditions. The extreme invasiveness of Norway maples is certainly the legacy they’ll most leave: it may be too late late to stop them.
Hello, excellent article. The only thing I would add is that the Crimson King Norway maple is a tree that people do actually seek out at the nursery. Truth is, even with the cards totally stacked against it by the author’s verdict, the Crimson is often a singularly magnificent tree. Try and find another purple like it and options are quite limited. Plant the beeches for the next generation, the plums are prone to a host of issues, and the crabapples can’t come close for landscape size and color. It must go, but the Crimson is loved.
My neighbor has an overgrown Norway maple growing next to my property line. Its canopy is choking and slowly killing my crabapple, its roots are uplifting my asphalt driveway and its pollen has me confined to my home for several weeks each spring due to allergies. The Norway maple is a scourge and should be banned altogether. Better alternatives are abundant.
I heard a respected arborist/landscaper say that Crimson King looks like a “black hole” in the landscape, and I have seen them that way ever since. Especially older trees look nothing like crimson, more like a dark brown, slightly reddish.
I’ll certainly remember that: it is really quite a striking analogy!