20171229A Linnaeus, Nationalmuseum press photo .jpg
Even Carl Linnaeus would be confused about the current state of botanical names! Source: Nationalmuseum press photo

When Carl Linnaeus developed the binomial system of nomenclature for plants and animals in 1753, where each species was placed in a genus (the first name) with other closely related species, then given a specific name (the second name) that only applied to it, it was designed to simplify their naming. So, you’d have species with names like Homo (genus) sapiens (species) for humans or Taraxacum officinale for the dandelion and the same name would be applied all over the world. No more biological tower of Babel!

The system has worked fairly well over the last 250 years, although, for various reasons, some names have been changed … but never so many as today. That’s because taxonomists (scientists who name plants) have a new tool not available in Linnaeus’s time: in-depth genetic studies. He grouped species together according to the appearance of their organs, notably those of their sexual parts, and that was usually pretty accurate.

However…

Evolution can lead two beings to evolve similar organs even though they’re not closely related. And the newly acquired ability of being able to study the DNA of plants and animals (DNA sequencing) means we can look more deeply into the makeup of any being than was ever possible in the past. This has revolutionized the field of taxonomy and caused a great deal of change in scientific names as the true relationships between species are slowly revealed.

Putting a Name on It

20171229B Tropical Plant Pictures .jpg
It’s not your imagination: botanical names really are changing more frequently these days. Source: Tropical Plant Pictures

The result of this is that many well-known plants (I’ll stick to botany here) have changed names … often repeatedly, as more is learned about them. The coleus went from being called Coleus blumei to Solenostemon scutellarioides and is now Plectranthus scutellarioides. The Monterey cypress went from being Callitropsis macrocarpa to Cupressus macrocarpa, then Neocupressus macrocarpa, then back to Cupressus macrocarpa … and now it’s possible it will end up with yet another name, to Hesperocyparis macrocarpa.

(I wrote in more detail about this in Why Do Plant Names Change? and you might want to read that.)

The question now becomes: what is the current accepted Latin name of any given plant? People like myself, who share knowledge about plants—writers, lecturers, teachers, bloggers, gardeners, etc.—, need to be able to put the right name on the right plant. But where do you go to find it?

My Solution

20171229C.pngFor the last few years, I’ve been using The Plant List, subtitled A working list of all plant species, as my source of up-to-date botanical names. It provides the accepted Latin name for most species. Over one million species names, 350,000 considered valid, appear on it in about 17,000 plant genera. The two principal collaborators are the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, and the Missouri Botanical Garden, two places I used to go for confirmation of plant names anyway.

20171229D.png
Just enter the botanical name you know and click on Search. Soon the current status of the name will appear. Source: The Plant List

When I have a plant whose botanical name is in doubt, I go to www.theplantlist.org, enter the botanical name I know, and the screen then shows me the current status of the plant’s name. There’ll be an Accepted name and, most likely, a series of synonyms, names it once had. I use the Accepted name in my writing and lecturing.

Not Perfect

Of course, The Plant List isn’t perfect. First, some 20% of plant names are listed as “unresolved,” meaning more work is needed in determining the correct name (fortunately, most “unresolved” names are of rarely grown plants). Also, it will never be 100% up-to-date, as it is only updated periodically. For example, I know from other sources that the botanical name of Monterey cypress (mentioned above) is likely to change from the current Accepted Latin name of Cupressus macrocarpus to Hesperocyparis macrocarpa, but I’ll stick to the Plant List name until it officially recognizes the change.

You’ll find that many, perhaps most, people working in the field of horticulture do the same.


Not sure of a plant name? Just go to The Plant List. It will give you a good enough name for your purposes!20171229C

Larry Hodgson is one of Canada’s best-known garden communicators. He has notably been editor-in-chief of HousePlant Magazine, Fleurs, Plantes et Jardins, À Fleur de Pot and Houseplant Forum magazines and is currently the garden correspondent for Le Soleil and radio garden commentator for CKIA-FM Radio. He has written for many garden publications in both the United States and Canada, including Canadian Gardening, Harrowsmith, Horticulture, Fine Gardening and Organic Gardening. He also speaks frequently to horticultural groups throughout Canada and the U.S. His book credits include The Garden Lover’s Guide to Canada, Complete Guide to Houseplants, Making the Most of Shade, Perennials for Every Purpose, Annuals for Every Purpose, and Houseplants for Dummies, as well as nearly 60 other titles in English and French. He is a past president of the Garden Writers Association (now Garden Communicators International) and the winner of the prestigious 2006 Garden Media Promoter Award offered by the Perennial Plant Association. He resides in Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

0 comments on “Finding the Right Botanical Name

Leave a Reply

Sign up for the Laidback Gardener blog and receive articles in your inbox every morning!

%d bloggers like this: